On June 24th, 2013, this Blog took note of the newly launched Jewish lobby, Jewish Refugee Action Network (J-RAN), devoted entirely to advancing "Gypsy" (Roma) immigration into Canada. See: (Canadian Jewish Supremacists Demand “Open Borders” for Canada). Today, 23 October 2014, the town of Hexthorpe in England is besieged by a recent flood of Gypsy immigrants, attracted by British social benefits. According to The Mail Online,

"Residents of Hexthorpe, South Yorkshire, said people would take the law into their own hands unless the authorities step in to combat anti-social behaviour".

Foreword: With this exclusive English translation for 1867confederation.com, I am starting a new occasional series under the category "The FQS in English". [Ed. FC1867]

The French original of this article (text by the FQS) was first published in the French Harfang, No. 2, Vol. 1; and republished by the FQS under the title "Écosse, Québec : à quoi bon l’indépendance ?"

Texte de la F.Q.S.

Article du Harfang, No. 2 Vol. 1

Les souverainistes québécois jubilaient en octobre dernier (2012) lorsque le premier ministre écossais Alex Salmond signa une entente avec le premier ministre britannique David Cameron sur un référendum en 2014 sur l’indépendance de l’Écosse. Les souverainistes du Québec, qui craignent ne jamais voir un référendum gagnant de leur vie, sont donc heureux d’apprendre que si la souveraineté n’est pas à l’ordre du jour au Québec et ce, malgré le Parti Québécois au pouvoir, elle l’est quelque part dans le monde.

Foreword: An exclusive English translation of yet another important article by the Fédération Québécoise de Souche (F.Q.S.): Le concile Vatican II: Une révolution tranquille dans l'Église. The original French text online at the F.Q.S..

 

 

Texte de la F.Q.S.

La crise des accommodements raison­nables a mis en évidence la recru­des­cence de diverses pratiques religieuses chez les communautés culturelles issues de l’immigration au Québec. Devant ce constat, on ne peut que se demander le pourquoi de cet abandon de la pratique religieuse chez les Québécois de souche. Quelle en fut la source ?

Foreword [Ed. FC1867]: The French original of this article was first published by the FQS under the title "FQS -- L'école de l'étrange".


"The School of the Strange" will give you an idea of what is happening in Quebec education. All appears to be contrary to the family values and Catholic traditions of this Province.

Avant-propos par Ed. FC1867:  L'original de cet article fut éditée par l'FQS sous le titre "FQS -- L'école de l'étrange."

Introduction

En principe, l'éducation publique se doit de veiller à la continuité des valeurs morales, culturelles et traditionnelles enseignées à la maison. Les parents envoient leurs enfants à l'école en toute confiance, considérant que l'enseignant instruit prendra en main l'éducation de sa progéniture sur des matières qui dépassent leur compétence parentale.

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Reposted from the original, entitled "The Milner-Fabian Conspiracy against Humanity", posted on October 13, 2012 at The Milner-Fabian Conspiracy.

Foreword:  Images and captions are by FC1867.  I'm using quotation marks in this article to highlight important passages.  Masochistic white people, pay attention!

Hi, everybody.

This is an urgent note to tell you that my web host has shut off my cpanel access, meaning the main controls to all my web sites.

ALL my sites will therefore VANISH any minute. However, I am working hard to get them all back up elsewhere, it's a lot of work, and it will be a few days or so before things are back to normal.

I have been with this host on a monthly basis for 18 months. There has been "unusual" interference in the back end of my principal blogs and web sites. It doesn't look like typical "hacking". And it isn't "malware". It's an intruder. I use 120-bit encryption in my passwords, and I don't think that it's a hacker. It has not happened to me on any other server, free or paid.

Last week, I installed a slew of security plugins to monitor for intruders.

This week, just a few days later, by surprise, the web host sent me a threatening email (which I received 3 days later), alleging my blogs were full of "malware".

He had shut off my entire account, and taken down all my web sites. You may have noticed this site offline the other day.

The web host claimed the "malware" was caused by my not updating scripts and plugins. However, the very web sites the web host accused, had been fully updated by me the previous week!

Moreover, the "malware" he claimed to have discovered was allegedly all linked to the default wordpress themes that are provided by WordPress itself, during the automatic instals. These were not my themes, I wasn't even using them! And even these default themes were current and up-to-date.

On account of these allegations that I was not "updating" my scripts, the web host declared he would cancel my hosting account!

Do you think it is reasonable to threaten to put a dozen web sites offline, belonging to a good client who pays, because they "allegedly" did not update Wordpress default themes?

Does that sound pretty exaggerated to you?

If you know anything about WordPress, and hosting, nobody who values his 3 domain name renewals a year, and his $10 USD a month hosting fees on a paltry 4GB of space, is going to threaten a client on account of "updates". And in particular, as I am quick to do my updates, even though I use my own themes, and not themes by WordPress.

When I found his email and his threat, I wrote back to him, denying his allegations. I pointed out that the very sites he accused of not being "updated" had indeed been updated just last week

A dispute then transpired, and he has now shut off my cpanel, although my hosting was and is always paid up to date. In fact, I had added $10.00 USD balance to my hosting account with this web host, to ensure this month was paid in advance. Nonetheless, he has marked my hosting "CANCELLED".

As a result, THIS PRESENT web site, and ALL my web sites -- all of which are ideologically linked to my main site, which is HABEAS CORPUS CANADA, will vanish very soon.

When you see this web site vanish, DO NOT ASSUME that it is gone.

I am working hard in the background to re-upload and re-instal it elsewhere, and it will re-appear with the SAME DOMAIN NAME.

I thank all my visitors for dropping by, I appreciate your interest, and I request your kind support and patience as I switch servers.

I am a one-woman team with no staff, doing this all myself, learning as I go along. Eventually, all will be back online.

Thank you!
Have a great day, everybody!
Kathleen Moore
ALLIANCE OF THE FOUNDING PEOPLES OF CANADA
ALLIANCE DES PEUPLES FONDATEURS DU CANADA
HABEAS CORPUS CANADA
The Official Legal Challenge
To North American Union

David Duke has now covered the story that I wrote about here, in June, 2013, under the title: Multiculturalism is Genocide: Jews Demand More Refugee Immigration into Canada!

Here is David Duke's new article, published on July 18th, 2013:

---

Canadian Jewish Supremacists Demand “Open Borders” for Canada

Jewish Supremacists in Canada have formed a new organization to oppose common-sense restrictions on bogus asylum seekers seeking entrance to that country—while maintaining solid support for Israel which violently expels almost all asylum seekers, real or bogus, as detailed in a new report by the Human Rights Watch (HRW) organization.

 




Jewish Refugee Action Network (J-RAN) Launched

The new Jewish Supremacist organization in Canada, named the Jewish Refugee Action Network (J-RAN), was founded by Rabbi Arthur Bielfeld who hypocritically claimed that it was “rooted in… the ancient summons to welcome the stranger.”

Israel, however, the subject of rabbi Bielfeld’s devotion, has no such policy. Instead, as the new HRW report showed, the Zionist state imprisons and deports “strangers”.

J-RAN was founded by Rabbi Bielfeld, Sephen Lewis, former Canadian ambassador to the United Nations and former leader of the Ontario New Democratic Party, journalist Michele Landsberg, Mary Jo Leddy, founder of Romero House, and Ken Rosenberg from the law firm Paliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP,.

Bielfeld, rabbi emeritus at Temple Emanu-El, criticized a new Canadian law, Bill C-31, saying it “contradicted Canadian values of tolerance and diversity” while targeting the “Roma in Hungary for exclusion.”

The Canadian law changes how prospective refugees are dealt with. The key change was the introduction of a list of “safe” countries.

Those nations considered stable, democratic and unlikely to produce credible refugee cases (called “Designated Countries of Origin,” or DCO for short) have their asylum applications fast-tracked.

Unlike refugees from non-DCO countries, they can’t enroll in national healthcare while they wait for their claim to be processed and their ability to appeal a negative decision is significantly curtailed.

This is hardly a major deterrence to asylum seekers, but even this slight shift is enough to enrage the Jewish Supremacists.

“This legislation clearly turns back the clock,” Rabbi Bielfeld said. “Some of us feel [the changes] are draconian and very much at odds with what we consider the essence of Canadian culture.”

Well-known Jewish extremist in Canada, Bernie Faber, who is former leader of the Canadian Jewish Congress, added that he “believed that Hungary was specifically picked to target Roma refugees who the minister himself designated as ‘bogus.’”

J-RAN’s plan is to “muster support for a repeal of the immigration legislation by mobilizing their board’s considerable contacts within the Canadian political system and generating public outrage over the changes.”

Meanwhile, the Human Rights Watch organization has announced July 15 that “Israeli authorities are using new procedures to pressure at least 1,400 Eritrean and Sudanese asylum seekers, some detained for over a year, to return to their countries.

“Under international law, asylum seekers should be detained only in exceptional circumstances, their claims should be fairly examined and they should never be forced or pressured to return to a country where they face a serious risk of persecution.”

The HRW report went on to reveal that detainees “are told that if they do not agree to be sent home, they face years in detention. On July 14, 2013, 14 Eritreans detained for many months left Israel for Eritrea via Istanbul. Some of the group told the UN refugee agency they would ‘do anything to get out of prison.’

“’It doesn’t matter how Israel dresses this up, this is using the threat of prolonged detention to force Eritrean and Sudanese nationals to give up their asylum claims,’ said Gerry Simpson, senior refugee researcher at Human Rights Watch. ‘Israel should end its unlawful detention policy and release all asylum seekers while their claims are fairly examined.’”

Once again it is clear that the Jewish Supremacists have two standards at work: one for non-Jews, where “open borders” and mass immigration are encouraged; and another for Jews and Israel, where closed borders and compulsory deportation of non-Jews is the norm.


- 30 -

Zionist multiculturalism is destroying our nations. London, Paris, and now Sweden, up in flames as immigrants attack their "liberal, tolerant" hosts.

Remember this video?



Infamous Israeli, Barbara Spectre, with her husband, Rabbi Philip Spectre, "made aliyah" (pronounced al-ee-YAW from the Hebrew, meaning "ascent" or "going up") to Ashkelon, Israel in 1967. Jewish tradition views traveling to the land of Israel as an ascent, both geographically and metaphysically.

Spectre then apparently "descended" from Israel into Sweden where she launched Paideia, The European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden, a non-denominational academic institute established in 2001.

In its 10 years of existence (2011) Paideia has educated over 200 persons from 35 countries for leadership positions in the renewal of Jewish culture in Europe.

Notice that she's not educating these 200 non-Jews for the renewal of their own cultures!

Spectre co-founded Paideia in Sweden to temper an alleged rise of "antisemitism" because of what Spectre herself unembarrassedly defines as the key role of Jews in multiculturalism for Sweden and for Europe.

VIDEO HIGHLIGHTS:

Said Spectre:

"I think there’s a resurgence of antisemitism because at this point in time, Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural.

And I think we’re going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which MUST take place.

Europe is NOT going to be the monolithic… uh… uh… societies that they once were in the last century. [She means "nations".]

Jews are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role.

But, without that leading role and without that transformation Europe will not survive."

You can read the whole transcript here:

"The Key Role of Jews in Multiculturalism"


Sounds more to me like Europe is "not surviving" Zionist multiculturalism!

Which of course is the whole point, if you are not naive. The goal? No nation left standing, but Israel.

To that end, Spectre and her tribe have racked up yet another multicultural success story. One more civilized white western nation is on the way to its own suicide!

As of May 2013, multi-ethnic Sweden has gone up in flames.

UK, Paris, Sweden, -- who next?

Perhaps Canada.

The similarities between Sweden's liberal, generous welfare state, and that of Canada are striking. Including the free housing, social programs, free language integration, and the "welcoming attitude" toward the immigrants.

In Canada's case, the mass deluge of third-world foreigners into our most generous nation (world's largest refugee population, per capita) began a few years later than into Sweden. Our intake spiked in the late 1980's, and early 1990's, and has not relented.

Canada should be in for its own riots in two or three years or so. we have already been warned by a young Somali of the coming "blood in the streets of Toronto". I saw that newscast, myself.

The multicultural catastrophe that has fallen on Sweden, has left close observers puzzled and wondering what possibly could have gone wrong in this "multi-ethnic paradise".

Well, at least the "ascended" Israeli took credit for the "six-day holocaust" in Husby, Stockholm and parts of Sweden, in advance.

Said Spectre in the foregoing video:

"Jews are going to be at the center of that."

"I think we’re going to be part of the throes of that transformation"

"Riots"? "Throes"? Sounds right to me.

Here's our news update from The Telegraph (emphases added):

Original url: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/sweden/10080320/Stockholm-riots-leave-Swedens-dreams-of-perfect-society-up-in-smoke.html
Calameo backup: http://en.calameo.com/books/00074744751ac2b2affcb
 

Stockholm riots leave Sweden's dreams of perfect society up in smoke 

"Like the millions of other ordinary Swedes whom he now sees himself as one of, Mohammed Abbas fears his dream society is now under threat. When he first arrived in Stockholm as refugee from Iran in 1994, the vast Husby council estate where he settled was a mixture of locals and foreigners, a melting pot for what was supposed to be a harmonious, multi-racial paradise.

Two decades on, though, "white flight" has left only one in five of Husby's flats occupied by ethnic Swedes, and many of their immigrant replacements do not seem to share his view that a new life in Sweden is a dream come true. Last week, the neighbourhood erupted into rioting, sparking some of the fiercest urban unrest that Sweden has seen in decades, and a new debate about the success of racial integration.

"In the old days, the neighbourhood was more Swedish and life felt like a dream, but now there are just too many foreigners, and a new generation that has grown up here with just their own culture," he said, gesturing towards the hooded youths milling around in Husby's pedestrianised shopping precinct.

"Also, in Sweden you cannot hit your children to discipline them, and this is a problem for foreign parents. The kids can feel they can cause whatever trouble they want, and the police don't even arrest any of them most of the time."

This weekend, after six consecutive nights of rioting, Mr Mohammed was not the only one questioning the Swedish social model's preference for the carrot over the stick. Many Swedes were left asking why a country that prides itself on a generous welfare state, liberal social attitudes and a welcoming attitude towards immigrants should ever have race riots in the first place.


The disturbances erupted in Husby last weekend, after police shot dead an elderly man brandishing a machete inside his house. Angered at what they saw as police heavy-handedness, youths torched cars and buildings and stoned police and firefighters. Police were then forced to draft in extra manpower from outside Stockholm as the trouble spread to other immigrant-dominated suburbs of the capital and towns such as Orebro in central Sweden, where 25 masked youths set fire to a school on Friday night.

Up too in smoke has gone the notion that egalitarian Sweden, which has largely avoided the global recession, might be immune from the social problems blighting less affluent parts of Europe.

Sweden's centre-right prime minister, Frederik Reinfeldt, blamed "hooligans" but also talked sympathatically of the difficult "transition period between different cultures". Meanwhile politicians from the Swedish Left, which ruled the country for most of the post-war period, blamed the trouble on social spending cuts introduced by Mr Reinfeldt, whose Moderate Party vowed to trim - though not slash - the welfare budget when he took office in 2006.

But amid the soulsearching last week, perhaps the most telling comment was the one from Kjell Lindgren, the spokesman for Stockholm Police. "We don't know why they are doing this," he said, when asked for a cause for the riots. "There is no answer to it."

Certainly, wandering around Husby last week, it was hard at first glance to see quite what the problem was. Built in the 1970s as part of the "Million Programme" that aimed to give affordable housing for all Swedes, the estate is one of dozens on Stockholm's outskirts that now house mainly immigrant populations, including large numbers from Somalia, Eritrea, Afghanistan and Iraq.

However, comparisons to the Paris "banlieus", or indeed riot-hit Tottenham or Salford, are limited. Between the rows of clean-looking housing blocks are well-tended flowerbeds and neatly-kept public gardens, and in the shopping precinct, where an ornamental fountain still bubbles away, there are bars, shops, and a smart cafe-bakery that would not look too out of place in an IKEA catalogue. At eight per cent, Husby's joblessness rate is three times the Swedish average, but only slightly higher than that in the UK.

Likewise, although the rioting has been large scale by Swedish standards, seen up close it has less of the ferocity of the 2011 disturbances in Britain. When The Sunday Telegraph visited Husby late on Wednesday night, the highlight was a hit-and-run arson attack on two parked cars. Police were hardly to be seen, and when they did arrive, it was purely to protect the firefighters dealing with the car blaze rather than make arrests.

Instead, teams of well-intentioned volunteers from local community groups and Islamic associations mingled with the crowds of excited onlookers, politely suggesting that they expressed their grievances peacefully.

Among a large group gathered on an overhead walkway was Mohammed Abdu, 27, whose family came to Sweden from Eritrea when he was aged three, and who now works as a security guard. While he condemned the violence as "hooliganism", he claimed that many Husby residents still suffered from discrimination from the police and employers. Besides, he added, living in such a prosperous, advanced country offered no real satisfaction for those so conspicuously at the bottom of the heap.

"It's true that the welfare system here is an example to the rest of the world, so if you fall here you do not fall all the way to the bottom," he said. "But people don't like being dependent on social welfare, and there is hidden racism."

Not so, argued Yusuf Carlos, 32, a construction worker from Palestine. "It is just kids causing this trouble, that is why the police are not doing much about it," he said. "Sweden is fair towards immigrants and it isn't hard to find work, or not before these riots anyway. The problem is that the Swedish people are angry now. They don't know why people here in Husby are doing this, only that they come from this neighbourhood."

Certainly, claims of racism upset many Swedes, who have little colonial history, and whose decision to admit large numbers of Third World migrants from the 1980s onwards was born of no particular political obligation, more just a very Swedish sense of humanitarian duty to the wider world. From the very start, the government also sought to avoid creating a German-style "guest worker" class by promoting immigrants' rights and introducing a plethora of programmes to promote racial integration.

Yet despite Swedish language education being offered free to all long-term immigrants, ghettos of foreigners have flourished in recent years. So too have Far Right parties challenging the political class's long-standing pro-immigration consensus, who now command up to 10 per cent of the vote and may increase their share in next year's elections.



"We have tried harder than any other European country to integrate, spending billions on a welfare system that is designed to help jobless immigrants and guarantee them a good quality of life," said Marc Abramsson, leader of the National Democrats Party. "Yet we have areas where there are ethnic groups that just don't identify with Swedish society. They see the police and even the fire brigade as part of the state, and they attack them. We have tried everything, anything, to improve things, but it hasn't worked.

It's not about racism, it's just that multi-culturalism doesn't recognise how humans actually function."

Aje Carlbom, a Swedish academic and author of a critical study into Swedish immigration policy, added that despite the increasing appeal of Far Right parties, mainstream Swedish politicians were still reluctant to even ask the kind of questions that the likes of Mr Abramsson was already offering answers to.

"Anyone who wants to regulate immigration is immediately classified as a nationalist, which also implies a racist as well," he said. "It is still almost impossible to debate this question."

Still, some of Husby's younger generation argue that it is unreasonable of Swedes to expect them to be perennially "grateful" for taking them in, even from the dire circumstances in their homelands.

Among them is local youth worker Rami al Khamisi, 25, whose family escaped to Sweden from Saddam Hussein's Iraq back in 1994, smuggling themselves first through Turkey and Russia and then across the Baltic in a fishing boat commandeered by a people smuggler. "I was six years old and the boat was packed with about 60 people," he said. "An old man died, and they threw him in the water because his body was smelling a lot."

That, though, he says, is his only real memory of the hardships of his early life, and as such, he finds it hard to be as thankful as his parents still are to his adopted homeland. "They compare it to Baghdad or Somalia," he said. "But we younger immigrants only really know Sweden, and we just compare our situation to the one around us."

With Stockholm still burning this weekend, though, that may be asking for just a little too much understanding - even in compassionate, generous Sweden."

- 30 -
 

Just found a new one, this is cute:

http://1867confederation.com/fun/multicultural-madness-joke-2/


Or, go to the Fun tab.
 
- 30 -

Foreword: I was surfing today when I came across a web site called "upworthy.com". The moment I clicked the link to enter their site, I was accosted by an automated survey which blocked my way. It demanded to know, in brief words to the following effect:

"Do you support equality regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, etc., etc."

BREAKING NEWS: Canadian Jews Organize New Lobby to Force the Immigration of Gypsies into Canada! (Article below)


Gypsies in Argos (Greece) on Market day
Yes, we have (no) bananas!

By way of a foreword to the featured article below, which I found in the Canadian Jewish News of June 21st, 2013, here is an excerpt from a new book by Dr. David Duke, "The Secret Behind Communism," which is pending publication.

[caption id="attachment_15097" align="alignnone" width="300"] Rex Woods' painting of the dead of the First World War[/caption] Canadian artist, Rex Woods, has left Canada a moral heritage and questions about our present and our past that must be answered, before we lose it all. Who was Rex Woods?

In 1964, Rex Woods began a commission for the Confederation Life insurance company to recreate Robert Harris's heirloom portrait of the Fathers of Confederation, which had been lost in a fire at the Parliament buildings in 1916. Three delegates to the London Conference of 1866 were added on the right by Woods. The Woods tribute to Robert Harris was unveiled during 1967 Centennial celebrations.

"Blacks-only" school ok'd in Ontario

Segregation and Education: from USA's "Brown v. Board of Education to Canada"

The ideas raised in this post apply not just to "blacks and whites," but to all ethnic groups, and their right to appropriate education and group social interaction.

[caption id="attachment_15117" align="alignleft" width="300"]"The black-focused school is a go." -- TheStar.com, Wed Jan 30 2008[/caption]
After a heated but civil debate, Canada's largest school board voted 11-9 last night to open an alternative Africentric school to help fight a 40 per cent dropout rate among Toronto's black teens."

I came across an interesting footnote in a French article by a law professor at the University of Montreal. The footnote leads me to observations concerning segregated blacks-only schools, as opposed to de-segregated schools which force the races together for apparently "social" reasons which may be detrimental to all concerned.

I will give you a quick translation of the footnote, and the French original will follow below.

“[118] In this respect, the interesting question arises in particular of the precedential value of a legal conclusion with regard to a social fact. One will remember that in the famous case of Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.SW. 483 (1954), the Supreme Court of the United States pronounced separate schools unconstitutional, because of harmful effect of this system for the development of black children. Did the effect of separate schools, thus decided by the Court, become A POINT OF LAW? It seems that in certain connections one must answer in the affirmative, since the courts later rejected a challenge to this conclusion, made with proof in support, on the basis that the point OF LAW had been definitively decided. On this question, see G.S. PERRY and C.B. MELTON, loc. cit., note 12.667, who writes, in particular:

«When a LEGAL conclusion seems to rest on empirical assumptions (e.g., the psychological harm of school segregation), then those assumptions may become de facto CONCLUSIONS OF LAW which are NOT DISPUTABLE, regardless of the social reality.»
– «Precedential Value of Judicial Notice of Social Facts: Parham as an Example», (1983) 33 J. Fam. L. 633, 636 et 637.

/ Original French quote:

^{" [118] À cet égard, se pose notamment l'intéressante question de la valeur de précédent d'une conclusion judiciaire à l’égard d’un fait social. On se souviendra que dans la célébre affaire Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.SW. 483 (1954), la Cour suprême des États Unis a prononcé l’inconstitutionnalité des écoles séparés, à cause du caractère néfaste de ce système pour le dévéloppement des enfants noirs. L’effet des écoles séparés, ainsi décidé par la Cour, deveait-il une question de droit ? Il semble qu’à certains égards on doive répondre par l’affirmative, puisque l’on a rejeté une contestation ultérieure de cette conclusion, menée avec preuve à l’appui, au motif que la question DE DROIT avait été définitivement décidée. Voir sur cette question, G. S. PERRY et C. B. MELTON, loc. cit., note 12, 667, qui écrivent notamment :
«When a LEGAL conclusion seems to rest on empirical assumptions (e.g., the psychological harm of school segregation), then those assumptions may become de facto CONCLUSIONS OF LAW which are NOT DISPUTABLE, regardless of the social reality.»
– «Precedential Value of Judicial Notice of Social Facts: Parham as an Example», (1983) 33 J. Fam. L. 633, 636 et 637.}

The extract that I've given you above is from: "La connaissance d'office des faits sociaux en contexte constitutionnel", 1997 31 R.J.T. 315, by Danielle PINARD.

This is Pinard's web page at her University:

Danielle Pinard, Professeure titulaire, Faculté de droit, Université de Montréal

This is the page to her article that I've quoted for you:

"La connaissance d'office des faits sociaux en contexte constitutionnel", 1997 31 R.J.T. 315, by Danielle PINARD.

Elsewhere in her French law journal article, author Pinard cites the same source on "Precedential Value ...".

“Social facts [... Pinard means in the course of a law suit, i.e., involving constitutional questions – KM] may be "found" through judicial assumption, commonsense inference, or individual subconscious values; through empirical research or the tales of old wives (or husbands). But whether the PROCESS of their identification is subjective assumption or empirical proof, these FACTS about SOCIETAL conditions and operation ENTER the system to GUIDE judicial decisions on social issues.“

(Caps are mine for emphasis.)

What Pinard was after in providing this quote seems to me to have been to demonstrate to lawyers and judges that the judicial use of "social facts" in a peremptory way, applied so as to draw unalterable conclusions as if they were drawing conclusions of LAW, then binds the system to those "social" facts as deductions of constitutional LAW. By constitutionalising inferences about societal dynamics, this makes it hard to change the system to deal with reality.

In her French article, Pinard seems to caution judges against using their courts to convert "social facts" into law. This would tend to prevent society from altering its system in order make it work better for all.

A couple of years ago, I had heard that somewhere in Ontario, a blacks-only school had been set up, staffed with black teachers. I don't remember the name of that school, but today there are links online on the same subject -- blacks-only schools.

In interviews, the teachers I had read about 2+ years ago, declared that black students were doing better or would do better in a blacks-only school.

This would seem to fly in the face of the U.S.A.'s Brown v. Board of Education.

It would seem that social or learning problems experienced by black students do not disappear even when they are integrated into the white or general school system. They continue to have issues.

To show you how the viewpoint seems to have changed, there is the observation at this next page that the objective is not presupposed "equality" but is more realistically based on mobilizing "the system to provide equity in student outcome."

http://resources.curriculum.org/secretariat/february23.shtml

Here's a link (there had been a video clip here from 2008, the clip seems to have vanished):

Headline: McGuinty against black school but won't stop it
Caption: "Toronto school trustees have given their approval for a black-focused public school - believed the first of its kind in the country. (Jan. 30, 2008)"

And here's another link (Black-focused school debate set
Published on Wednesday November 07, 2007).

Evidently, there are fundamental racial or ethnic differences at play which defy the concept that everyone is mathematically "equal" in an abstract sense, and that everyone should therefore be treated exactly alike, and that everyone has exactly the same capabilities.

Sometimes, obtaining justice and "equality of chances" (as the socialists like to call it) requires being treated differently, according to one's one capacities and one's own real needs.

Today, some black communities appear to view segregation in education as an essential step toward tailoring the curriculum and the teaching methods to help black students succeed.

It would be an odd sight indeed if white students lined up and banged on the doors of a blacks-only school demanding admission and claiming "psychological harm" and discrimination!

Perhaps, however, they might bang on the doors of de-segregated schools to claim it in their own behalf, since white citizens, including white Canadians, have been de facto stigmatized as "RACISTS" by the aura of the USA's Brown v. Board of Education.

I wonder if that case was really about giving advantages to black students, or about moralizing, and chastising and "correcting" "racist" white people for preferring to learn on their own in their own system.

The current claimed success of blacks-only schools also raises the question of whether white students have been and are being disadvantaged by educational de-segregation.

Does one group hold another back? i.e., is the "white" system altered on the fly to the detriment of one group in an effort to "help" another? Or in an effort to accomplish other agendas?

The white system has proven itself over generations to work well for white ethnic kids; there is no particular reason why it should also absolutely have to work for anyone else.

In the end, it seems that some black people believe school segregation is not "psychologically harmful" to their black children.

In fact, it seems odd to me that anyone -- let alone a court -- would decide that segregation of races in the school system is necessarily harmful.

It seems to me that it all comes down to the right to be who you are, both as a group, and as individuals. The fulfillment of this right necessitates being free from State-sponsored social engineering.

In Montreal, there have always been Jewish schools where non-Jews of any color are not accepted for enrollment. In contrast, in the mid-1960's, there was one Jewish student in our Catholic public school because she wanted to study in English, and her parents could not afford the private Jewish schools.

Back then, we had religious school boards under our Constitution of Canada; those have been changed now -- apparently to suit the infamous "multiculturalism" which is hosted under the banner of "secularism," which is apparently "humanism" which I think the United States Supreme Court has judicially recognized as a "religion," and thus not "secular" at all.

No Montreal Jews, as far as I know, have ever complained that they are "psychologically disadvantaged" by their own deliberately mostly segregated Jewish-only schools. They emerge upon graduation and work and socialize with the general population, all races, all colors.

However, I have observed that Jews tend to form majority-Jewish-owned-and-run businesses and professional service firms, and to hire mostly "white". This is something that non-Jewish "white" people apparently cannot "get away with" doing today, as it violates some kind of "multicultural" principle which is applicable only to depriving "white" (Christian?) Canadians of the right to freely associate. Obviously, if you cannot freely associate as a group, in education, and in the workplace, you cannot freely pursue the maintenance and development of your own views and culture.

I suspect that some people may have chosen to make an issue out of black-white school segregation at the time of "Brown" because the invention of victims in all walks of life is vested with power.

A victim clearly has no power; therefore, somebody who is not a victim is required to seize and exercise the victim's own suppressed power for him; and that suppressed and seized power then becomes a political force in other hands to fuel many agendas.

I have also read that much of the sociology and psychology of the Brown v. Board of Education era may have come from politically motivated Jews who saw it as a way to destabilize the white American system and culture to enhance their own power in USA, and by example, elsewhere. To deny the possibility would be to suggest that certain groups of people do not ever try to dominate other groups of people.

So as not to be naive, the prospect is worthy of investigation.

I'm no expert; these are just ideas you might like to file away.

Regards,
Kathleen Moore
Montreal, Canada

- 30 -

Sources:

[1] "Board okays black-focused school," Ontario, Wed Jan 30 2008, thestar.com

[2] "Black-focused school debate set," Ontario, 2007-11-07, thestar.com

[3] "McGuinty against black school but won't stop it," Ontario, Thu Jan 31 2008, thestar.com

[4] "Successful Practices in the Education of Black Students, Webcast: February 23, 2006 with Dr. Asa Hilliard"
 

Click to view it now, and read the transcript and commentary:

The Key Role of Jews in the Multicultural Transformation of Europe: Barbara Spectre (with FRENCH sub-titles to wake up Québec)

- 30 -
 

[caption id="attachment_1087" align="alignnone" width="300"] Confederation Wax Museum, Ottawa, Ontario[/caption]
The border is being eliminated between Canada and the USA. North American Union is coming. High treason!

Then Western Hemispheric Union is coming. The European peoples who founded America and Canada are disappearing.

Mass immigration, paid for by Canadian tax-dollars, is helping to erase that border by "harmonizing" our population and demographics with those of the USA, Mexico and South America. Southern populations in their billions will flow towards Canada, eradicating our people, our form of government, our culture, our heritage and our nation.

Mass immigration is unconstitutional. Canada is an ethnic confederation of its Founding Peoples. Each Provincial Legislature belongs to one of the Founding Peoples, and there are more than two! Thus, we have 10 Provinces, plus territories and regions.

The fact that the Founding Peoples of Canada happen to be white is purely incidental to the fact that we ourselves are ethnic groups entitled to our own respective Legislatures, founded for us in 1867 to preserve us and our cultures.

Formally removing the border, for example on the pretext of another manufactured 9/11, will sound the death-knell to the Founding Peoples of Canada and of the United States of America.

Culture, temperament and mentality, and form of government are unique to each race. We are entitled to be who we are. We have a right to exist. We must stop the mass immigration! We must stop the treasonous corporate-fascist-fueled North American Union! It will take nothing less to save the Founding Peoples of Canada!

Will we wake up and stand up in time to take back what belongs to us, before we cease to exist! Do we want to be a minority on our own soil?

Do we want to exist, do we want self-government? It belongs to us, but we are allowing it to slip away.

Or, will the last Canadian left be a waxed mummy in Madame Tussaud's Wax Museum?

The news today:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Welcome to the new off-white America.

A historic decline in the number of U.S. whites and the fast growth of Latinos are blurring traditional black-white color lines, testing the limits of civil rights laws and reshaping political alliances as "whiteness" begins to lose its numerical dominance.

Long in coming, the demographic shift was most vividly illustrated in last November's re-election of President Barack Obama, the first black president, despite a historically low percentage of white supporters.

It's now a potent backdrop to the immigration issue being debated in Congress that could offer a path to citizenship for 11 million mostly Hispanic illegal immigrants. Also, the Supreme Court is deciding cases this term on affirmative action and voting rights that could redefine race and equality in the U.S.

The latest census data and polling from The Associated Press highlight the historic change in a nation in which non-Hispanic whites will lose their majority in the next generation, somewhere around the year 2043.

Despite being a nation of immigrants, America's tip to a white minority has never occurred in its 237-year history and will be a first among the world's major post-industrial societies. Brazil, a developing nation, has crossed the threshold to "majority-minority" status; a few cities in France and England are near, if not past that point.

The international experience and recent U.S. events point to an uncertain future for American race relations. In Brazil, where multiracialism is celebrated, social mobility remains among the world's lowest for blacks while wealth is concentrated among whites at the top. In France, race is not recorded on government census forms and people share a unified Gallic identity, yet high levels of racial discrimination persist.

"The American experience has always been a story of color. In the 20th century it was a story of the black-white line. In the 21st century we are moving into a new off-white moment," says Marcelo Suarez-Orozco, a global expert on immigration and dean of UCLA's Graduate School of Education & Information Studies.

"Numerically, the U.S. is being transformed. The question now is whether our institutions are being transformed," he said. The shift is being driven by the modern wave of U.S. newcomers from Latin America and Asia. Their annual inflow of 650,000 people since 1965, at a rate that's grown in recent years, surpasses the pace of the last great immigration wave a century ago. That influx, from 1820 to 1920, brought in Irish, Germans, Italians and Jews from Europe and made the gateway of Ellis Island, N.Y., an immigrant landmark, symbolizing freedom, liberty and the American dream.

An equal factor is today's aging white population, mostly baby boomers, whose coming wave of retirements will create a need for first- and second-generation immigrants to help take their place in the workforce.

The numbers already demonstrate that being white is fading as a test of American-ness: — More U.S. babies are now born to minorities than whites, a milestone reached last year. — More than 45 percent of students in kindergarten through 12th grade are minorities. The Census Bureau projects that in five years the number of nonwhite children will surpass 50 percent.

— The District of Columbia, Hawaii, California, New Mexico and Texas have minority populations greater than 50 percent. By 2020, eight more states are projected to join the list: Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey and New York. Latinos already outnumber whites in New Mexico; California will tip to a Latino plurality next year.

— By 2039, racial and ethnic minorities will make up a majority of the U.S. working-age population, helping to support a disproportionately elderly white population through Social Security and other payroll taxes. More than 1 in 4 people ages 18-64 will be Latino.

— The white population, now at 197.8 million, is projected to peak at 200 million in 2024, before entering a steady decline in absolute numbers. Currently 63 percent of the U.S. population, the white share is expected to drop below 50 percent by 2043, when racial and ethnic minorities will collectively become a U.S. majority. Hispanics will drive most of the minority growth, due mostly to high birth rates, jumping in share from 17 percent to 26 percent.

The pace of assimilation for today's Latinos and Asian-Americans is often compared with that of the Poles, Irish, Italians and Jews who arrived around the turn of the 20th century and eventually merged into an American white mainstream.

There was a backlash. By the 1930s, an immigrant-weary America had imposed strict quotas and closed its borders. Those newly arrived were pushed to conform and blend in with a white mainstream, benefiting from New Deal economic programs that generally excluded blacks. The immigration quotas also cut off the supply of new workers to ethnic enclaves and reduced social and economic contacts between immigrants and their countries of origin.

"America of the Melting Pot comes to End," read a 1924 opinion headline in The New York Times. The author, a U.S. senator, pledged that strict new immigration quotas would "preserve racial type as it exists here today."

Today, data show that Latinos are embracing U.S. life but also maintaining strong ties to their heritage, aided by a new stream of foreign-born immigrants who arrive each year. Hispanics, officially an ethnic group, strive to learn English and 1 in 4 intermarry, taking a white spouse.

Nowadays, immigrants face less pressure to conform than did their counterparts from a century ago. Latinos are protected as a minority, benefiting from the 1950s civil rights movement pioneered by blacks. Nearly 40 percent of Latinos now resist a white identity on census forms, checking a box indicating "some other race" to establish a Hispanic race identity.

While growing diversity is often a step toward a post-racial U.S., sociologists caution that the politics of racial diversity could just as easily become more magnified. A first-of-its-kind AP poll conducted in 2011 found that a slight majority of whites expressed racial bias against Hispanics and that their attitudes were similar to or even greater than the bias they held toward blacks. Hispanics also remained somewhat residentially segregated from whites in lower-income neighborhoods, hurt in part by the disappearance of good-paying, midskill manufacturing jobs that helped white ethnics rise into the middle class during most of the 20th century.

The AP survey was conducted with researchers from Stanford University, the University of Michigan and NORC at the University of Chicago. Harvard economist George Borjas projects that by 2030, the children of today's immigrants will earn on average 10 percent to 15 percent less than nonimmigrant Americans, based on past trends, and that Latinos will particularly struggle because of high rates of poverty, lack of citizenship and lower rates of education. In 1940, the children of early 20th-century white ethnics fared much better on average, earning 21.4 percent more than nonimmigrants.

About 35 percent of Hispanic babies are currently born into poverty, compared with 41 percent of blacks and 20 percent for whites. "How America responds now to the new challenges of racial and ethnic diversity will determine whether it becomes a more open and inclusive society in the future — one that provides equal opportunities and justice for all," said Daniel Lichter, a Cornell sociologist and past president of the Population Association of America.

The demographic shift has spurred debate as to whether some civil-rights era programs, such as affirmative action in college admissions, should begin to focus on income level rather than race or ethnicity. The Supreme Court will rule on the issue by late June.

Following a racially lopsided re-election, Obama has spoken broadly about promoting social and economic opportunity. In his State of the Union speech, he said that rebuilding the middle class is "our generation's task." Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., a rising star of a mostly white Republican party now eager to attract Latino voters, is courting supporters in both English and Spanish in part by pledging programs that would boost "social mobility."

Left unclear is how much of a role government can or should play in lifting the disadvantaged, in an era of strapped federal budgets and rising debt. The Latino immigrants include Irma Guereque, 60, of Las Vegas, who says enjoying a middle-class life is what's most important to her.

Things turned bad for the Mexico native in the recent recession after her work hours as a food server were cut at the Texas Station casino off the Strip. As a result, she couldn't make the mortgage payments on a spacious house she purchased and was forced to move into an apartment with her grandchildren.

While she's getting almost full-time hours now, money is often on her mind. Her finances mean retirement is hardly an option, even though she's got diabetes and is getting older. Many politicians are "only thinking of the rich, and not the poor, and that's not right," Guereque said in Spanish. "We need opportunities for everyone."

Associated Press writers Elaine Ganley in Montfermeil, France, Jenny Barchfield in Rio de Janeiro and Michelle Rindels in Las Vegas contributed to this report.
Online:
Census Bureau: http://www.census.gov
EDITOR'S NOTE _ "America at the Tipping Point: The Changing Face of a Nation" is an occasional series examining the changing cultural mosaic of the U.S. and its historic shift to a majority-minority nation.

- 30 -

L'unité de disque dur est tombée hors de mon portatif et a frappé la terre il y a 48 heures. Elle fait un bruit terrible, et ne peut pas être lue.

Je dois trouver des fonds pour récupérer les données, c.-à-d., tous mes mots de passe.

En attendant, les polluposteurs s'amusent ici !

Il semble que les "spambots" peuvent lire des captchas !

Je dois trouver une extension pour mettre fin à cela.

En attendant, j'écris comme un utilisateur, et pas comme Admin, car c'est la seule possibilité en ce moment.

Merci de votre patience !

Kathleen Moore
Admin
Fonder le Canada