"J.P. Rushton and David Suzuki debate at the University of Western Ontario, February 8th, 1989. David Suzuki takes a rather moralistic tone througouht the entire debate, while Rushton just wants to stick with the science of the matter. Unsurprisingly, most of the audience is hostile to Rushton."

We are, of course, all aware, as a matter of fact, that some individuals are more clever than other individuals. What the opposition to Dr. Rushton wants us to believe, blindly, on pain of social stigma, is that the empirically observable and objectively verifiable statistical distribution of these individual differences (thanks to nature) does not differ at all from one racial population to another. This is where science itself becomes politically incorrect and subject to suppression on the assumption that truth, if unpleasant, is both useless and socially unacceptable.

We poor little human beings, who are too frightened to think, and to face truth, must at all costs be protected from truth by political correctness. For us, the earth must indeed revolve around the sun, as our fragile psyches could tolerate no contrary evidence.

In the absence of truth, politics will have to invent other explanations for the readily observable differences between the races, even if it means unjustly and even wickedly blaming one race for the general lack of achievement and bad temper of of another race, by for example tarring one race as "oppressors" and "supremacists".

Let us not forget, as I think many black people like to forget, that some 1 million "white" men died in the American civil war of 1861-65 to free the black ("negro') slaves. Untold generations of never-born heirs and descendants of those white men also died when they died. That is millions of white souls lost to give blacks their opportunity. Is there a monument anywhere in any black town to those million white men and the future children they sacrificed?

Let us not forget that in United Kingdom, a black slave brought to British soil was freed by the courts on habeas corpus; the judge did not request his IQ before he freed him. IQ is irrelevant to equality before the law, but still very relevant to differences between individuals and populations of individuals. People & peoples are not "equal" in an abstract mathematical sense, but morally it was a western principle that all must have equal opportunity based on merit, not Marxist affirmative action.

I have in fact known a black brain surgeon from Boston, and wrote his resume for him. However, in public school, the one black student in our class was the lowest performer, the two orientals excelled at math, chemistry and physics; the caucasians excelled in language and literature, and sorry to say, but the one Jewish student was undistinguished. All had the same teachers, the same curriculum and the same opportunity for 4 years in a class of 30. One of the teachers -- the math teacher, was black. The distribution of giftedness in that classroom may well be reflected in the general racial populations. It's an interesting question which deserves honest investigation.

One branch of such an investigation would have to be whether there is an innate tendency of each racial group to develop its own particular type of culture and self-governance.

If, as I believe, the races are both intellectually and temperamentally different, then each is entitled to the social climate and self-governance it is best able to generate for itself to accommodate its own mentality without interference.

Any attempt to level all forms of governance to the same common denominator (i.e., for world government) so as to artificially eliminate such differences, does spiritual violence to the distinct racial, social and cultural rights of each and every distinct people.

I am therefore opposed to mass-immigration of dissimilar populations into Canada. In my view, attempting to seat the immigrated emissaries of 200+ foreign races and cultures in Canada's parliament hijacks my roots and my culture for other purposes, while stripping me of what fundamentally belongs to me and to my people.

Veils, turbans and saris in the Canadian legislatures will undoubtedly hamper the ability of the Founding Canadians to maintain and to further develop their own invention of parliamentary government according to their own innate temperament and capacities.

Moreover, Confederation was done in 1867 to guarantee to the Founding Peoples of Canada their own self-governance for all time according to their own temperament and inclinations.

Mass dissimilar immigration violates the legal jurisdictions of the Founding Peoples of Canada, reserved to them by the Constitution, and destroys them culturally and racially by forcing mass-homogenization.

Scratching an X on cardboard is not democracy; because procedure is not substance. Stuffing a parliament devised by a handful of races for their own needs with 200 other races whom the Founders are forced to accommodate is not parliamentary. It's just a way of imaging a global government in Canada, while destroying the lawful Parliament and those to whom it belongs.

- 30 -