A few words in advance:

One of the excuses offered by the federal government for mass immigration to Canada is the need to "fill jobs" due to declining Canadian birth rates and our aging and retiring Baby Boomers.

But this is patently ridiculous: if the size of the population is decreasing, there are FEWER people to serve, thus fewer jobs to fill, and not a rise in the number of unfilled vacancies.

A recent indication that this is true -- that mass immigration is not to "fill" jobs -- is the claim by a black "socialist" Muslim in the Montreal-based AWAJ newspaper (15 July-15 August 2012) that there is rampant unemployment of Blacks in the city of Montreal.

There should be NO unemployment of anyone if the immigrants were really being brought here to "fill jobs" that would otherwise be "vacant".

I think we all know this lame excuse is a part of a cover-up to the multicultural scam being perpetrated on all of us, both in Canada and the West in general.

What are we going to do about it?

As soon as we get the Communists and their lackeys out of our governments (see, i.e., nosnowinmoscow.com and in particular the article on Red Harper); and as soon as we recover control of our Parliament under our lawful Constitution (which Trudeau illegally ousted in 1982), we have a de facto precedent today for PAID REPATRIATION of certain types of non-integrateable immigrants: the Assisted Voluntary Return and Reintegration (AVRR) program.

I first suggested such a program a few weeks ago in a comment at Facebook. I have now discovered that Canada is already using a similar kind of program for the return of rejected refugee claimants to their countries of origin.

This new pilot project -- described below -- can be developed and expanded to humanely repatriate any immigrant who has no job prospects in Canada or who stands to become a long-term drain on our socialist-subsidized health, legal, social, cultural and housing programs.

It can also help to repatriate any immigrant who may pose a grave risk to the cultural homogeneity and lawful federal heritage of the Founding Canadians; or to the unity and national security of Canada.

What is a Founding Canadian?

Let's start with a concept we will need to distinguish between Canadians protected by Canadians who are protected by our federal Constitution, and immigrants attempting to establish themselves under the illegal policy of multiculturalism.  (I will explain the illegality in another post.)

Perhaps the question should be, who are Founding Canadians?

Founding Canadians are the man, woman and child who consider that the British North America Act, 1867 gave them permanent roots, and a legal right to them.

Founding Canadians are the descendants of the Founding Peoples; and in some cases, they are the adoptive heirs of the Founding Peoples, and have come to join us in the past 150 years, and who have assimilated into our inherent Canadian cultures under one of our Provincial Legislatures.

What is the Precedent for Repatriating Immigrants?

As featured on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), and reported in a pidgin-English multicult tabloid in Montreal (AWAJ, 15 July-15 August 2012), the Harper federal government is offering to pay some failed refugee claimants to leave the country.  The Fed will pick up the tab for their plane ticket, and top it up with as much as $2,000 in cash to speed the exit of the erstwhile immigrant.

This existing REPATRIATION PILOT PROJECT is being run by the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) and the International Organization for Migration (IOM). It was launched in the summer of 2012 in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA). The IOM has been operating similar projects all over the world for more than 30 years.

So, not only is there a federal Canadian precedent for formally helping non-integrateable immigrants to return home, there is a world precedent, and an organization and infrastructures dedicated to helping the immigrants do it.

Both the Canadian and the international organization can be expanded, notably by Canadian contributions to the IOM's funding, personnel and infrastructures. In fact, we can offer to enhance the IOM's funding if they will hire some of our immigrant candidates for paid repatriation as agents to carry out an expanded IOM program for Canada in various countries overseas.

So, what is the precedent for the program?

The existing Assisted Voluntary Return and Reintegration (AVRR) program is for refugee claimants whose applications have been rejected and whose appeals have failed.

It is up the CBSA to enforce the removal of such failed refugee applicants, but the federal government (of Stephen Harper) is now providing an incentive for them to leave voluntarily.

Those who qualify can get a plane ticket back to their country of origin and up to $2,000.00. The money is to be used to help the rejected immigrant find a job, set up a business, or go back to school in their home country.

"A voluntary return offers you a way to return home with support, dignity and anonymity,"

says the CBSA web site in its description of the new program.

How much money someone can receive depends on whether they have started an appeal process of the Immigration Review Board's (IRB) decision rejecting their refugee application.

A rejected claimant is eligible for the full $2,000 if he or she applies before going to the Federal Court for a review of the IRB decision.

He or she is eligible for $1,500 if the application is made before requesting a pre-removal risk assessment, and eligible for $1,000 if he or she has already made that application and received a decision.

The new program had offered an added incentive until July 13th 2012 to help get it off the ground: applicants might have been eligible for the full $2,000 even if they had already filed appeals.

The CBSA has placed limits on who can apply for the paid repatriation program. Rejected claimants with a criminal record, for example, cannot take part.

Let's expand this program to include ALL dissimilar Immigrants

How can we expand and improve this paid repatriation program?

The Assisted Voluntary Return and Reintegration (AVRR) program can be expanded to help restore Canada's cultural balance within legal federalism, by removing multiculturalism from our soil, humanely.

Such a program will protect the constitutional and democratic rights of Founding Canadians, while combating both their cultural and racial genocide, which will become inevitable if multiculturalism is not stopped and reversed.

Such a program seeks to peacefully and in a dignified way, repatriate dissimilar foreigners whose only "fault" is that they believed the false propaganda of those who are abusing federal and provincial powers in Canada by imposing multiculturalism on top of legal federalism in order to eradicate Founding Canadians, our Constitution, and Canada.

I have a few draft suggestions for an expanded paid repatriation program. Hopefully, these will attract comments to enhance and improve the concept.

How could the paid repatriation program be expanded?

First, the goals of an expanded repatriation program at all times must include:

• [a] to reverse the unconstitutional process of converting Canadian soil to multiculturalism and to restore cultural -- and in some cases, racial -- homogeneity to each federal area of Canada, thus averting mass genocide of the Canadian Founding Peoples whose legal, cultural and traditional roots are British North American.  The term "British North American" includes all Founding French Canadians, who, obviously, were British subjects up until 1931 when Canada was legally emancipated by the Statute of Westminster;


• [b]to reverse and help stop the unconstitutional conversion of Canada into a nation of mutually hostile cultural and religious ghettos and no-go zones, as has happened in Europe.  We do not wish to repeat here the egregious errors made in Europe which are now destroying that ancient source of modern civilization;


• [c] to roll back socialism as far as possible in order to restore a liberal parliament and legislatures to Canada; while also eliminating the funding basis which I suspect is the sole major support for the current extraordinary levels of mass immigration in place since at least 1992;

The benefits of such a paid repatriation program are obvious, and include the promotion of national and social unity and political stability, which were basic aims of the Founding Fathers in 1867.

Who gets the program?

Identify Eligible Immigrants:

1. First, we need to identify the type of immigrant who would be eligible for paid repatriation under an expanded AVRR program.

2. Then, we need to "score" potential applicants for the sake of priority. In other words, who can we move out the fastest and get the program going.

Potential types of candidates for paid repatriation:

• [a] Immigrants generally who arrived in Canada since 1990 when the current mass wave of "multiculturalism" was initiated, bringing in huge populations of culturally dissimilar immigrants;


• [b] Unemployed immigrants who cannot or will not integrate socially, culturally and politically into Canada's parliamentary system and society.  In particular, they would be unable or unwilling to integrate into a Liberal society, because I believe we need to roll back socialism dramatically, whose main purpose today appears to be the mass-subsidization of excessive immigration flooding into Canada since 1992.


• [c] Unemployed immigrants from dissimilar cultures, i.e., non-parliamentary, theocratic, dictatorial regimes and non-Christian religious cultures, or cultures hostile to Christianity, to Christian nations, and to the West in particular. By this, I do not mean that all Founding Canadians are necessarily practising Christians. What I mean is merely to identify Western civilization as arising from Christian roots, and with or without the practice of a formal religion, the principles which we associate today with the West, arose, in fact, from a Christian basis developed and modernized (like our English Constitution) over many centuries.


• [d] Immigrants with criminal records must absolutely be eligible, top of the list. The paid repatriation program must include the making of appropriate federal treaty arrangements with home countries of immigrants with criminal records, so as to jointly assist in their rehabilitation on their own home soil, where they should be allowed to complete their sentences.  In the alternative, they should be able to have their sentences commuted to community service under paid joint supervision in the course of reintegration into their home countries.  A decision will have to be made as to whether we set up patriation of prisoners serving hard terms; or whether they complete their terms here, or obtain early release (depending on the nature of the crime) on condition of their accepting paid repatriation. We have, for instance, in recent years, a 10% increase in black convicts in Canada. Could such people be repatriated and have their sentences commuted? Prisoners and former prisoners should receive job training or re-training in their home countries under joint Canada-foreign supervision.


• [e] All immigrants from dissimilar, non-integratable cultures should always be eligible for paid repatriation: i.e., people from non-parliamentary, theocratic, dictatorial regimes and non-Christian religious cultures, or from cultures hostile to Christianity and to Christian nations, and hostile to the West in general.


• [d] Islamic immgrants should always be eligible for paid repatriation, and in fact they should be offered it directly. Canada is not an Islamic country, and constitutionally is not going to become an Islamic country, in whole or in part. We are not going to deal with demands for Shariah law on Canadian soil, nor risk that they will carry it out anyway, in secret, in our fields and meadows. We are not going to deal with demands for Sharia "secession" of parts of Canada from Canadian soil. We have already witnessed three good reasons to rapidly eliminate Islam from Canada in a peaceable and humane manner: (1) They have attacked our Parliament with intent to blow it up and decapitate our government.  This, in my view, makes Islam an enemy cult on Canadian soil.  It should be dealt with in accordance under modified War Measures and not by imposing a police state on all Canadians, depriving us of our freedoms; (2) Islamic Somalis have already threatened "blood in the streets" of Toronto on public news channels, I think it was CTV,  (if we don't "give" them "good jobs").The huge gap in judgment of people able to say this to us on the CTV needs to be remedied by rapid paid repatriation.(3) Stephen Harper has already identified Islam as the single greatest national security risk to Canada.  Nonetheless, he is continuing to bring them in!  This is an outrage. It is not lawful for our government to expose Canadians to mass death-threats on our soil by foreign groups.
  
  Moreover, these people -- behind the public threat of mass violence in Toronto -- need to be specifically identified, contacted, and offered repatriation with appropriate conditions, such as job training on their own soil, asap.
  
  Islamic repatriation should proceed to the top of the list, given the status of Islam as Canada's #1 national security threat, with preference in the line-up based on scoring other points, i.e., "unemployed", "criminal record", serving a commutable sentence, anti-white racism, terrorist activities, etc.
  
  All dissimilar immigrants should qualify
  
  [a] Immigrants from China, India, Africa and Islamic countries, the "honor killers", etc., and any others who are changing the cultural landscape of Canada, should all be eligible for paid repatriation.
  
  Those who come from overpopulated continents, or from Communist countries whose mentality we do not want, and where they are a member of a race which (unlike Canadians) is at no risk of disappearance, should be encouraged to avail themselves of paid repatriation.

Where paid repatriation is sought by employed or self-employed Islamic immigrants, a program for liquefying their assets in Canada, such as property and businesses owned, at reasonable market value, should accompany any other program feature, i.e., plane tickets and reintegration, etc. Funds so liquefied should be directly deposited into a bank on their home country's soil and no access to the funds provided until the immigrant actually goes there.

Paid Repatriation - What would the expanded program Include?

An expanded paid repatriation program should include:

(1) a plane ticket;

(2) a compulsory transitional program on the soil of the immigrant's home country, involving:

• (a) re-acclimatization (and socialization) to the domestic home culture. No one should be "dumped" in a country they have lost touch with (except by cell phone and satellite) and left to their own devices;


• (b) help to secure (or to create) reasonable housing;


• (c) training or re-training suitable to the home country's culture, economy and marketplace to ensure successful integration of the returned immigrant into a job and a lifestyle natural to that home culture;


• (c) The program should focus on helping returned immigrants create the kinds of jobs and businesses that are not only relevant locally in their home country, but will also tend to employ others on their home soil, and act as models for others in those home countries to emulate.


• (d) Immigrants who cannot return to their home country whatever the reason, should be patriated to another country of similar cultural and demographic composition based on treaties and agreements with such receiving country;

How would the expanded paid repatriation program be paid for?

The expanded program should use:

(a) all funds to a maximum period of ten (10) years of expenditures per immigrant or per immigrant family, which would otherwise be spent in Canada keeping such immigrants on social assistance programs, or providing them with routine social services (medical, legal, educational, economic assistance, etc.);

(b) again, the program should be linked to Canada's foreign aid commitments. Only those countries which accept the program and actively cooperate with it should receive Canadian foreign aid. Countries that suffer from natural disasters receive substantial foreign aid from Canada and we take huge boatloads of their immigrants. For example, Bangladesh (flood), Haiti (earthquake), or Indonesia (tsunami), should have their foreign aid easily linked to acceptance of repatriation programs.

(c) the majority of funds now used for immigration, and all its phases, including provincial welfare payments, should now be redirected to paid repatriation and linked to international development aid. Immigration should be reduced to absolutely minimal levels, and to ZERO for populations envisioned by the expanded paid repatriation program.

(d) expenditures per immigrant: the program should last -- in each case, depending on the context -- up to a maximum of 10 years per immigrant or per immigrant family, after which they are on their own. Ten years maximum should be more than sufficient to help certain people get on their feet.

Who would run the expanded paid repatriation program?

First of all, the program must be jointly supervised by both Canadian and foreign "home" authorities, and it should be supervised on the foreign soil through program offices attached to Canadian consulates and embassies, which also administer passports.

Treaties should be signed, if necessary, and international development aid should be linked to the program as an inducement to conclude such treaties and accept the program.

The program should be supervised by Canadian government agents on the foreign soil in question. In fact, some or even most of those "Canadian" agents should be immigrant recipients of the paid repatriation program, which automatically creates professional JOBS overseas.

Such immigrants "agents" should be trained here to carry out the program, but only based on their signature of waivers in advance and renunciation of Canadian citizenship, in exchange for their overseas contracts, renewals or extensions thereof. During such contracts, they will be and act as special temporary agents of the Canadian government, subject to our control, and with the permission of their new home government.

If any such immigrants renege on their contracts, or fail to perform, they should be transferred to the regular paid repatriation program and subject to the same rules and conditions as the majority of paid repatriation recipients, with a maximum 10-year limit for Canadian support, minus any contract time already worked as a Canadian "agent" on foreign soil.

How do we prevent abuse of the paid program?

All immigrants who are candidates for paid repatriation must sign certified (sworn) waivers formally renouncing Canadian citizenship or any right thereto for themselves and their offspring. Such renunciation would take effect automatically upon their acceptance into the program. In other words, there would be no turning back. An agreement to go is an agreement to go. These waivers should be considered contractual, and be formally enrolled with the validity of statutes to ensure compliance.

Immigrants accepted by the program must be DNA-sampled and fingerprinted, iris-scanned etc., to ensure that they and their offspring do not come back under other names to take advantage of the program again and again.

What are the benefits of the program for Canadians?

(a) restoration of the Constitutional right of Founding Canadians to their own culture, legal and political system, and SELF-government without the interference of hundreds of foreign cultures;

(b) restoration of long-term cohesion and political stability to Canada;

(c) removal of a very serious national security threat;

(d) removal of the chief means of merging Canada into the USA and Mexico: a population so totally heterogeneous that it can easily be blended into the rest of the continent;

What else can be done to help restore the Founding Canadians?

(a) For any perceived loss of size in the general population, where necessary, baby bonuses and family subsidies should be made available to Founding Canadians to help them repopulate their traditional communities.

(b) Founding Canadians who have suffered a loss of identity or roots because of the forced break with our heritage under the Trudeau and Pearson de facto governments, etc., should be helped to recover their loss by means of special cultural and study programs. After all, the First Nations (Aboriginal peoples) are doing it, why not the rest of us.

Such programs should include historical and cultural materials omitted from general education in the past few decades while multiculturalism and Marxism have been taught to the detriment or exclusion of Canadian culture.

With an expanded PAID REPATRIATION program and help to Founding Canadians, eventually, the streets of Canada will be Canadian again, in culture and in demographics.

- 30 -

P.S.  For more on the topic of "multiculturalism" as unconstitutional, read my next post: (coming soon).