[caption id="attachment_15097" align="alignnone" width="300"] Rex Woods' painting of the dead of the First World War[/caption] Canadian artist, Rex Woods, has left Canada a moral heritage and questions about our present and our past that must be answered, before we lose it all. Who was Rex Woods?

In 1964, Rex Woods began a commission for the Confederation Life insurance company to recreate Robert Harris's heirloom portrait of the Fathers of Confederation, which had been lost in a fire at the Parliament buildings in 1916. Three delegates to the London Conference of 1866 were added on the right by Woods. The Woods tribute to Robert Harris was unveiled during 1967 Centennial celebrations.



[caption id="attachment_15099" align="alignnone" width="300"] Rex Woods' recreation of Robert Harris's painting of the Charlottetown Conference of September 1864, best known as The Fathers of Confederation[/caption]But Woods also gave to Canada a truly haunting portrait of equal if not greater relevance. Woods painted the dead of World War I FN², portraying men some of whom offered up their lives for Canada. They died to preserve this nation, its people and its British North American and French Canadian cultures for all time to come. However, today, our peoples are being decimated and our land and culture sacrificed to Zionist multiculturalism -- the preservation of other peoples' cultures at the expense of our own. I imagine these men have come back from the grave to ask us "Why?".

These are our dead, our ancestors, our own come back to say:  "Why are you destroying the Canada founded in 1867 to last a thousand years? This was our home, our nation. What else did we die for? For what other cause did we sacrifice our lives on the so-called 'field of honor'? Surely, we died to protect and preserve it for all time?" "To preserve our Founding Peoples and our cultures.

If you think I exaggerate, then read a few words from Quebec historian, Frédéric Bastien FN³.

La Bataille de Londres, Dessous, secrets et coulisses du rapatriement constitutionnel (Frédéric Bastien) Boréal Press, April 2013
Bastien has been in the news since the 8th of April 2013, the date when he launched a book in French whose title translates to "The Battle of London, secrets behind the scenes of the patriation". His publisher -- Boreal Press-- put a preview chapter of "La Bataille de Londres" online. It's in French; I'll translate a couple of lines.

Speaking of the celebrations of April 17th, 1982, on Canada's so-called "patriation" of its constitution, with crowds bustling to purchase t-shirts and memorabilia, Bastien correctly notes FN¹:

But the buyers in quest of legal erudition seem few in number among the spectators pressed along the whole route of the Queen and Prince Philip.

These last, in a ritual inherited from another era, arrive in a horse-drawn coach flanked by an escort of Royal Canadian Mounted Police wearing the fabled red tunic. A clamor goes up as the royals pass –- he, sporting the uniform of the Royal Regiment of Canada, she wearing a turquoise dress and a mink fur –- while the crowd waves little maple-leaf flags that have been distributed for free. Some are so very moved that they cry hot tears at the sight of the queen who, arrived upon the hill, lowers the maple leaf to hoist the flag of the House of Windsor straight to the top of the Peace Tower.

At the time, no one underscored this strange paradox. Old Canada had deployed the most beautiful symbols of her tradition for a ritual by which, as it were, she sacrificed herself to the benefit of a "new" country, a country which Trudeau wished to see profoundly refounded FN⁴. The hara-kiri will take place symbolically on this altar of the new nation.

For, no doubt is possible, in spite of the royal protocol and the presence of the queen. What is taking place at this instant will shatter Canada, and the person responsible for this change is certainly Pierre Elliott Trudeau, who, in the parade of dignitaries, arrives right behind the sovereign."

Did you know that the Canada founded for us in 1867 was supposed to have destroyed itself in 1982?

Are you not curious? Will you not, like our own First Nations, try to rediscover who we really were, in order to decide whether you have lost (or been fleeced) of something you did not wish to part with?

Are you not aware that the "hara kiri" of 1982 was a step on the way to yet another and final act of national suicide, the North American multicultural, nationless, regional, continental union?

[caption id="attachment_15102" align="aligncenter" width="210"] Amero-North American Union[/caption]
- 30 -

__________


¹  French original:

"Mais les acheteurs en quête d’érudition juridique semblent peu nombreux parmi les spectateurs qui se pressent le long du parcours de la reine et du prince Philippe.

À l’époque, personne ne souligne cet étrange paradoxe. Le vieux Canada a déployé les plus beaux ornements de sa tradition pour un rituel où, en quelque sorte, il se sacrifie au profit d’un «nouveau» pays, un pays que Trudeau veut voir profondément refondé. Un hara-kiri qui aura lieu symboliquement sur cet autel de la nouvelle nation.

Ces derniers, dans un rituel hérité d’une autre époque, arrivent dans un carrosse tiré par des chevaux et flanqué d’une escorte d’agents de la Gendarmerie royale du Canada, vêtus de leur légendaire tunique rouge. La clameur monte au passage des souverains – lui arborant l’uniforme du Régiment royal du Canada, elle portant une robe turquoise et une fourrure de vison –, tandis que la foule agite de petits drapeaux unifoliés, qui ont été distribués gratuitement. Certains sont tellement émus qu’ils pleurent à chaudes larmes à la vue de la reine qui, arrivée sur la colline, abaisse l’unifolié pour hisser le drapeau de la maison de Windsor tout en haut de la tour de la Paix.

Car aucun doute n’est possible malgré le protocole royal et la présence de la reine. Ce qui se passe à ce moment va bouleverser le Canada, et le responsable de ce changement est bien sûr Pierre Elliott Trudeau, qui, dans le défilé des dignitaires, arrive juste derrière la souveraine."

²  Source: Rex Woods's painting of the dead of the First World War:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/loneprimate/2081257081/lightbox/

³  Frédéric Bastien, in his book, La Bataille de Londres, claims the so-called patriation was a "coup d'’état". The information he adduces in support of this is in fact irrelevant to the legal situation then, as now. However, there was indeed a coup, but not for the reasons Bastien claims. In fact, Bastien himself is a part of that same coup, unfolding slowly over the decades.

Along with coup insiders at Boréal Press, such as "fake separatist," Jean-François Lisée (a 1995 referendum strategy advisor to former de facto premier Jacques Parizeau), Bastien designed his book to provide window-dressing for the final dismantling of Canada for North American regional union. KM

⁴  How, precisely, did Pierre Elliott Trudeau wish to "profoundly refound" Canada as a "new" nation? (This is quite aside from the question of whether he had the legal power to do so. Canada did not commit suicide; the so-called "patriation" was an attempted murder.)  You can find out how, because I have translated Trudeau's April 1962 French article on the subject into English:  The New Treason of the Clerics. Had this been done in 1968 when Trudeau ran for Prime Minister, he'd have been turfed out. KM