Foreword: I was surfing today when I came across a web site called "upworthy.com". The moment I clicked the link to enter their site, I was accosted by an automated survey which blocked my way. It demanded to know, in brief words to the following effect:

"Do you support equality regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, etc., etc."

The UN gives aboriginal ethnic groups more rights than white ethnic democracies. The UN's International Labour Organization Accord 169 on Native People's Rights: "guarantees them identity, language, cultural, religious, land rights". But "white" cultures are meanwhile laid siege by mass immigration and multiculturalism, depriving us of all of these "fundamental rights" guaranteed by the UN to aboriginals.
- - -

The question was short; my response was conscripted to a choice between two push-buttons "YES" or "NO" by which I was reduced to a monkey without a word to say in my own behalf.

This is just all to give the false appearance that such an issue is black and white and simple, when in fact it is complex and cannot be answered "Yes" or "No" if you have been thinking about the issues.

Upworthy pulls the same "Yes/No" trick throughout its web site, you get no option to qualify your view, and the site offers NO comment fields. A tad totalitarian? Or maybe they're afraid that others will come up with good arguments to oust their Marxist-Trotskyist absolutism.

I therefore clicked NO, because I disagree that all individuals at all times in all situations are "equal" with any and all other individuals.

I then found the web site's email and wrote to them as follows:

To:  support@upworthy.com

Your opening survey today -- my first encounter with your site -- wanted to know if I "agree" with "equality" of everyone regardless of "race", etc., etc.

I had to say "No" because it was formulated as a leading question. And it was presented out of all context whatsoever.

The "equality" question is in fact a trick. If on the one hand you say that all individuals are "equal" to all other individuals, you can then turn around and use that to DENY the rights of particular GROUPS of individuals on a racial, legal and political basis.

Let me explain.

In 1867, Canada was passed into law at the United Kingdom Parliament as an ethnic Confederation of its Founding Peoples.

Canadians had chosen, after long and due debate of decades, which intensified in the 2-3 years leading to Confederation, to adopt legal and political institutions to preserve the culture and way of life of each of the ethnic founding peoples who were majorities in each of the regions which became the Provinces.

Now, in 2013, after decades of "Charters" on our books alleging this so-called absolute equality of every individual to every other individual, it is easy to observe that this alleged "equality" has been used to attack and disintegrate the ethnic unity and existence of each of the founding peoples of Canada, on their own Provincial soil.

Since when does any individual have the absolute right to join with countless numbers of other individuals, i.e., via mass immigration from non-compatible foreign countries, to destroy the self-government and the ethnic existence and cultural preservation of any particular ethnic racial group on its own soil?

The idea of rights used to be more properly understood as follows: your rights as an individual are limited only by my rights as an individual.

MY RIGHTS as a Canadian individual include the preservation and continuance of my ethnic group, my people, our culture, our form of government, and our mode of self-determination, which we provided for ourselves in 1867.

You, if you are a dissimilar immigrant who does not share my roots, culture, race and history, have NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER to gang up in numbers to seize my Legislature, overrule my people, dilute my culture, and force me to "accommodate" YOU on my soil. When in Rome, do as the Romans do, in other words, is still good for me.

The Bolsheviks in the 1930s in the USSR mass-murdered the natural racially ethnic Ukrainian people of what had been Russia, in the Ukrainian "Holodomor" to reduce their numbers. The Ukrainians were literally starved to death, including by roads blockaded to keep them from leaving the distraught region, or bringing food in, while Stalin exported all the grain, sufficient for all Ukrainians to have survived for five years.

But that is not my ultimate point with that story. Once the natural, racially ethnic Ukrainian people had been decimated in numbers, the Bolsheviks in a premeditated fashion then proceeded to import onto Ukrainian soil countless non-Ukrainian foreigners, deliberately to DESTROY the ethnic makeup of the Ukrainian people. That was, in the view of many, organized genocide.

What, pray tell, is the difference in effect and consequence between the Bolsheviks forcibly destroying the ethnic Ukrainians by importing foreigners into their midst, and the system today called "multiculturalism" which is drowning the founding ethnic Canadians -- the majority of whom were already ethnically Canadian to Canada at the time of Confederation in 1867 -- and telling each and every one of those individuals:  you are "EQUAL" to the ETHNIC Canadian RACES and are ENTITLED to lay seige to their Legislatures, and to join them in voting and making laws and adopting policies, which due to your presence, may be in your interests but contrary to the interests of those to whom the Legislatures belonged to begin with?

There is no difference whatever in CONSEQUENCE, RESULT, OUTCOME, whatever you want to call it.

I oppose so-called "multiculturalism" for Canada on the ground -- among others -- that Canada is an ETHNIC Confederation of ITS OWN Founding Peoples, and that multiculturalism is anti-national, anti-host-race, and destructive of my culture, my public education which is required to maintain my culture, and of my legal jurisdictions in the Provincial Legislatures and the federal Parliament, which were established for the UNIQUE benefit of the founding peoples, and their legitimate heirs and cultural and political successors, NOT mass rampant foreign all-in-the-pot immigration.

This false and deceptive notion of "equality" is being unlawfully used to erode and disintegrate the nation, peoples and cultures of CANADA, as founded in 1867, FOR us.

These viewpoints in no way disparage any person or group of any other ethnicity, sexual orientation, etc., etc., people are fine for the most part. SO ARE WE, and we are entitled to exist, but apparently are being stripped of our own institutions of self-government by mass immigration combined with this misplaced "equality" nonsense.

A concrete example of the [unequal treatment of peoples in established ethnic federations] going on in the name of Globalism, which uses "multiculturalism" to destroy host nations and their ethnic peoples and disintegrate their self-government, is this.

Take a good look at the 1989 International Labour Organization Accord 169 on Native People's Rights which:

"guarantees them identity, language, cultural, religious, land rights".

http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---normes/documents/publication/wcms_106474.pdf

C169-Indigenous-and-Tribal-Peoples-Convention

Please explain to me how you can declare, on the one hand, that groups which constitute "peoples" but which happen to be "aboriginal" (a sub-category of "peoples") have the guaranteed right to exist, the right to their own land, culture, etc. all necessary to exist, BUT:

The ethnically Canadian founders of Canada, who as different ethnic "peoples" are a subset of the notion of "a people" -- and who gave to themselves a Constitution in 1867 to ensure their own existence, culture, traditions and identity, are denied these very same things by the very same institutions coming out of the UN?

"Equality" is bafflegab palmed off in terms of imaginary "absolute rights" to use groups of ethnically foreign and "diverse" individuals to invade and destroy, disintegrate and eventually annihilate their unique HOST groups.

In the case of Canada, Canadians of 1867 were indeed ethnically unique, formed of course from stock that came originally from France and the UK, including Welsh, Irish, Scottish, French, English, and certain numbers of other Europeans such as the Dutch who came in with the United Empire Loyalists due to events in America in 1776.

However, by the time of Confederation in 1867, the vast majority of people who then called themselves "CANADIANS," after the old Province of Canada (Upper and Lower Canada) which was called CANADA, had been on North American soil so long, for a hundred, two hundred, and in cases over 400 years, that they were ETHNICALLY new racial and cultural societies. They were therefore NOT immigrants when they founded Canada; they were a few, just a few, different groups of ETHNIC CANADIANS.

They formed a government and a Parliament for themselves as ethnicities, and today they are being stripped of all of it.

How can one label stripping naturally ethnic racial groups of peoples of all of their own fundamental rights of self-government, culture and identity on their own soil "equality"?

Evidently, equality is more complex than mathematical equivalency.

Today, founding Canadians, who happen to be white, are publicly identified as "WHITE" by some perverse members of our governments, and a cry has gone up that we "white" Canadians are not entitled to jobs in our own government, or in the general workplace.

If there just happens to be someone of another race, culture and color who has submitted a resume, the person so unfortunate as to be native to his own soil, is to be overlooked for employment regardless of qualifications and merit, and he or she is to be put on the sidewalk, jobless if necessary, homeless if necessary, in the nation built by this person's ancestors, in deference to employing less qualified people just because they are a different race and color.

Where is the "equality" in that, my friend?

The game here is this. Pour them in by immigration. Raise up a cry against natural ethnic Canadians to displace, deny, and disenfranchise them.

At the outset, the displacement may be 15%, 35%; but as the influx of mass dissimilar immigration increases, the displacement also increases, the cry that has gone up to dispossess the natural Canadians does not cease!

The cry continues until the natural-born, racially ethnic Canadians are a tiny disaggregated minority on their OWN SOIL with NO self-government, and NO institutions any more to preserve and maintain themselves, all of their institutions being at the national and provincial levels, having been hijacked unconstitutionally and illegally to serve another system, so-called "multiculturalism".

I could go on and on with evidence that multiculturalism is just a fancy name for genocide, and is contrary to real "equality", but I am going to stop here because my back aches.

IN CONCLUSION:

Foreigners on my soil are not "equal*" to me because these are my Legislatures, for my self-government and for the preservation of my culture and people: not theirs.

These people have legislatures, or some form of government, somewhere else. They should be there working to protect and advance their own peoples, identities, cultures and values, and not raiding mine.

As founding Canadians, if we wish to experience diversity, we will practice "tourism".

Kind regards,

Kathleen Moore
HABEAS CORPUS CANADA
The Official Legal Challenge
To North American Union
www.habeascorpuscanada.com
www.1867confederation.com
www.mytalkcanada.com
www.nosnowinmoscow.com


- 30 -


* I believe that what the Marxists really mean when they say "equal" is "equivalent". Nobody is "equal" to anybody else; nor is anybody "equivalent" to anybody else. If that were the case, you could transfer out of Quebec every last French Canadian of the 7 million or so on the soil, say to Nigeria -- and you could transfer in 7 million or so French-speaking Arabs to replace all the missing French Canadians. That would be just fine with the Marxists, who think that one lump of protoplasm is the same as any other lump of protoplasm. But 7 million Arabs are not 'equivalent' to 7 million French Canadians. The concept itself is essentially a misleading mind-game.

The 7 million Arabs who might replace the 7 million missing French Canadians will never be French Canadians, despite the fact the Arabs might occupy Quebec soil. That is because every individual is unique; every cultural and ethnic group is unique. You cannot replace one individual with another, you cannot replace one ethnic group with another.

And if you mass-murder 10 million ethnic Ukrainians and transport in countless foreign groups to replace them, these foreign groups are obviously neither "equal" to nor the "equivalent" of the murdered and displaced Ukrainians. If that were the case, there would be no need for a concept of genocide.